MR-CC – ToE

Question 21 to 30: CLIMATE CHANGE: GLOBAL RESPONSIBILITY AND LOCAL IMPACT

Consider the passage below and answer the questions that follow.

India is growing rapidly, with new jobs, roads, schools, and hospitals are being built. But this growth depends on coal and other fuels, which cause pollution and global warming. Factories release harmful gases into the air, land, and water. This pollution is changing nature - some animals and plants are struggling to survive, while a few, like bacteria, are adapting.

International agreements like the Kyoto Protocol want to reduce pollution. Rich countries ask India to pollute less, but India argues rich nations caused most of the problem and that it also has the right to grow. Cutting forests and building cities also affect animals and their homes.

Some experts say India should use clean energy like solar and wind power, but these are expensive and could slow down the economy. Many workers in coal areas like Jharkhand and Chhattisgarh may lose jobs. At the same time, climate change is causing floods, heatwaves, and disasters.

Nuclear power generates electricity from uranium and plutonium without producing greenhouse gasses, making it cleaner than coal. But it has risks - radiation and nuclear accidents like Chernobyl (1986) and Fukushima (2011) can be dangerous. Many people worry about safety.

India must decide: How can it grow while protecting jobs and the nature?

21. Who should take the most responsibility for stopping climate change?

Government – Only strict laws and rules can control pollution.

Everyone equally – Climate change affects all, so all must help.

Rich people and big factories - They pollute the most and must take action.

No one should be forced – People and businesses should act by choice.

22. Should rich countries support poor countries in switching to green energy?

Yes, but only if poor countries follow strict rules.

No, each country should manage its own energy needs.

Yes, rich nations must take responsibility and help.

Yes, but poor countries should get time to adjust.

23. Should India follow global climate agreements even if it slows its economic growth?

Yes, but only if rich countries give money and technology help.

No, rich countries caused the problem, so India should focus on its growth.

No, India should focus on economic growth but follow basic environmental rules.

Yes, India should take the lead while making fair rules for all countries.

24. How can India grow its economy while protecting nature?

Focus only on economic growth; nature can be protected later.

Nature protection should be priority, even if it’s costly and difficult.

Follow basic environmental laws but focus on economic growth.

Balance economic growth and nature protection with flexible policies.

25. Should India enforce strict laws and fines on industries that cause pollution?

Yes, but only for big industries; small businesses may find it difficult.

Yes, strict laws and fines are needed to protect the environment.

Yes, but industries should get time and support to follow the rules.

No, industries should manage pollution without strict government rules.

26. Should India use nuclear power instead of coal, even if there are risks?

No, India doesn’t have strong safety rules or waste disposal.

No, nuclear power is too risky; India should use safer energy.

Yes, India must switch to nuclear power and take full responsibility.

Yes, but only after India is able to make strict safety rules.

27. Should India let foreign companies control renewable energy for faster growth?

No, it may harm India's energy independence and economy.

Yes, but only if local industries and workers benefit.

Yes, but India must take charge, ensuring fair rules and long-term benefits.

No, India should develop its own renewable energy sector.

28. Should India build more big dams for green energy?

No, dams destroy forests and displace people.

Yes, but focus on smaller, eco-friendly dams to reduce harm.

No, unless strict environmental protection and fair resettlement plans exist.

Yes, large dams are necessary, but their risks should be managed carefully.

29. Should humans take responsibility for protecting species affected by pollution?

Yes, but only if protecting species also benefits humans.

Yes, humans must restore nature and prevent species extinctions.

No, nature should decide which species survive.

Yes, humans should reduce harm and help species survive.

30. If you own a factory using fossil fuels, will you switch to renewable energy?

Yes, even if it costs more for long-term benefits.

No, fossil fuels are cheaper, so no need to switch.

Yes, but slowly, to balance business and nature.

Maybe, but only if renewable energy gives more profits in the future.

1. Choose one question from the scenario “CLIMATE CHANGE: GLOBAL RESPONSIBILITY AND LOCAL IMPACT" that you found most important or meaningful. (You may mention only the question number; you do not need to write the full question.)

2. Why did you think the selected question is important or meaningful? (You may answer in simple words or in your own language.)

3. Why do you agree with the option you selected for that question? (You may answer in simple words or in your own language.)

4. Your opinion about this topic was influenced by:

You changed your thinking after classroom learning/discussion

Your opinion was the same even before learning it

Other reason (please write in your own words)

MR (Climate Change) (Pilot Study)